Home General Info Jury Duty Local Rulings Tentative Rulings Civil, Criminal, Family Court Services, Small Claims, Traffic Employment Court Calendar Amador Casa

Civil Alternative Dispute Resolution Options

 

Amador Superior Court's hours of operation are 9:30am to 4:00pm, Monday through Friday.
The Court House will be open 8:00 am to 5:00 pm for access to the courtrooms.
But the public counters are unavailable until 9:30 am.

The Amador County Superior Court supports and encourages the use of Alternative Dispute Resolution ("ADR").  The Court has long recognized the value of early case management intervention and the use of alternative dispute resolution options for amenable and eligible cases.  Litigants have also expressed a high degree of satisfaction when using these options.

The most common forms of ADR are mediation and arbitration.  There are a number of other kinds of ADR as well.  In ADR, trained, impartial persons decide disputes or help parties decide disputes themselves.  These persons are called neutrals.  For example, in mediation, the neutral is the mediator.  Neutrals are chosen by the disputing parties or by the Court.

 

Advantages of ADR

  • ADR can be speedier.  A dispute often can be resolved in a matter of months, even weeks, through ADR, while a lawsuit can take years.
  • ADR can save money.  Court costs, attorneys fees, and expert fees can be saved.
  • ADR can permit more participation.  The parties may have more chances to tell their side of the story than in Court and may have more control over the outcome.
  • ADR can be flexible.  The parties can choose the ADR process that is best for them.  For example, in mediation the parties may decide how to resolve their dispute.
  • ADR can be cooperative.  This means that the parties having a dispute may work together with the neutral to resolve the dispute and agree to a remedy that makes sense to them, rather than work against each other.
  • ADR can reduce stress.  There are fewer, if any, Court appearances. In addition, because ADR can be speedier, and save money, and because the parties are normally cooperative, ADR is easier on the nerves.  The parties don't have a lawsuit hanging over their heads for years.
  • ADR can be more satisfying.  For all the above reasons, many people have reported a high degree of satisfaction with ADR.

Because of these advantages, many parties choose ADR to resolve a dispute, instead of filing a lawsuit.  Even when a lawsuit has been filed, the Court can refer the dispute to a neutral before the parties' positions harden and the lawsuit becomes costly.  ADR has been used to resolve disputes even after a trial, when the result is appealed.

Disadvantages of ADR

ADR may not be suitable for every dispute

  • If ADR is binding, the parties normally give up most Court protections, including a decision by a judge or jury under formal rules of evidence and procedure, and review for legal error by an appellate Court.
  • There generally is less opportunity to find out about the other side's case with ADR than with litigation.  ADR may not be effective if it takes place before the parties have sufficient information to resolve the dispute.
  • The neutral may charge a fee for his or her services.
  • If a dispute is not resolved through ADR, the parties may have to put time and money into both ADR and a lawsuit.
  • Lawsuits must be brought within specified periods of time, know as statutes of limitation.  Parties must be careful not to let a statute of limitations run out while a dispute is in an ADR process.

ADR Options

The Court currently offers the following ADR options:

Judicial Arbitration:  Judicial Arbitration is a binding or non-binding process where an arbitrator applies the law to the facts of the case and issues an award.  The goal of judicial arbitration is to provide parties with an adjudication that is earlier, faster, less formal and less expensive than trial.  The arbitrator's award may either become the judgment in the case if all parties accept or if no tiral de novo is requested within the required time.  either party may reject the award and request a trial de novo before the assigned judge if the arbitration was non-binding.  If a trial de novo is requested, the trial will usually be scheduled within a year of the filing date.

Parties may stipulate to binding or non-binding judicial arbitration or the judge may order the matter to arbitration at the case management conference, held approximately 150 days after filing, if a case is valued at under $50,000 and is "at issue".  The Court maintains a panel of approved judicial arbitrators who have practiced law for a minimum of five years and who have a certain amount of trial and/or arbitration experience.  In addition, if the parties select an arbitrator from the Court's panel, the Court will pay the arbitrator's fees.

Please see Amador County Superior Court Local Rules of Court for more information regarding judicial arbitration.

Settlement Conferences:  The goal of a settlement conference is to assist the parties in their efforts to negotiate a settlement of all or part of the dispute.  Amador County Superior Court Local Rules of Court allows any party to request a settlement conference or the parties may stipulate to a settlement conference.  The settlement conference may be conducted before the judge assigned to the case, another assigned judge or a pro tem appointed to act as settlement officer.  The Court may also order a case to a mandatory settlement conference prior to trial.

Other ADR options, not currently offered through the Court, include:

Voluntary ADR:  Parties may voluntarily stipulate to private mediation, private binding or non-binding arbitration, private early neutral evaluation or private judging outside the Court system at any time.

Court Ordered Mediation:  Mediation is a non-binding process in which a trained mediator 1) facilitates communication between disputants, and 2) assists parties in reaching a mutually acceptable resolution of all or part of their dispute.  In this process, the mediator carefully explores not only the relevant evidence and law, but also the parties' underlying interests, needs and priorities.  The mediator is not the decision-maker and does not resolve the dispute -- the parties do.  Mediation is a flexible, informal and confidential process that is less stressful than a formalized trial.

The Amador County Superior Court does not currently offer mediation as an ADR option.  However, the Court is in the process of developing a mediation program.  It is anticipated that this program will be implemented on or before January 1, 2002.  Most civil cases will be eligible for the program, with the exception of probate, guardianship, conservatorship, family law, juvenile court proceedings, small claims, small claim appeals, unlawful detainer actions, class actions, multi-party/complex construction defect, and other civil petitions.

The Court will maintain a panel of approved mediators that meet specific qualifications and who adhere to Court approved mediator ethics.  If parties select a mediator from the Court's panel, the Court will pay the mediator's fees for the specified term of the Court-ordered mediation session.

For the list of the Court's Civil Mediators click here

For Further Information
Please contact:

Alexandra Asterlin
Amador County Superior Court
500 Argonaut Lane
Jackson, CA  95642
(209) 257-2653